PEER: source diversity audit
Practice: track your sources

Who is in this game?

The game tells reporters to keep a record of who they contact and quote, and to review it, as BBC teams do in the 50:50 Project. This page does the same for the game itself. Every character who appears as a source is listed below with the characteristics they were cast with, then counted.

These are the characteristics the designer gave each character. With real sources, don’t guess: record what people tell you about themselves, or what is on the public record, and only where it is relevant and they are comfortable with it.

{{ peopleCount }}people counted
{{ rowCount }}appearances
Loading sources from the game…
{{ loadError }}

Breakdown

Each bar counts people, not appearances. The black marker shows the share of the population in England and Wales. The blue marker shows the BBC’s 50:50 target, where there is one.

{{ d.title }}

{{ r.label }}{{ r.count }} · {{ r.pct }}
{{ r.refText }}
{{ d.source }}

What the audit shows

{{ f.n }} {{ f.text }}
Findings exclude scenario figures and were written for the current set of questions.

Who gets which role

Appearances as a good source only (best answers, good choices, draft sources and named sources in scenarios), counted by PEER role. Weak options are counted separately.
{{ ct.title }} {{ c.label }}
{{ r.label }}{{ c.v }}

All sources

Source Appears in Gender Age Ethnicity Disability LGBTQ+ Faith shown Rural
{{ p.avatar }}
{{ p.name }}{{ p.id }}
{{ ap.q }} {{ ap.appears }}{{ ap.roleText }}{{ ap.lead }}
{{ p.gender }} {{ p.age }} {{ p.eth }} {{ p.disability }} {{ p.lgbtq }} {{ p.faith }} {{ p.rural }}
Not counted: anonymous vox pops and social media posts. Class, religion (beyond visible dress), sexuality (beyond a visible badge), rural or urban background and many disabilities can’t be seen. The audit only records them where the story says so, which is part of what it shows.